Roman Catholic Spiritual Direction

Should I read or consume non-Catholic devotional or bible study materials?

Q: Dear Dan, should I read or use non Catholic devotional or bible study materials?

Well of the Visitation ChurchA: This is a very important question. There are other cousin questions that follow the same line of concern. “Should I attend non-Catholic bible studies?” “Should I read protestant commentaries on scripture?” Before I answer this I must make one thing abundantly clear.

An Important Disclaimer

I am in no way anti-protestant or anti-anyone for that matter. I was a fervent protestant for more than a decade and it was a protestant pastor that God used to bring me into the first step of my relationship with Him. I am forever grateful for all the gifts that I received during my time in the protestant and evangelical worlds. As well, it is important to note that anyone and everyone that desires to understand Catholic spirituality is absolutely welcome to interact with us here. That said, the purpose of this site is to specifically spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ as defined by the magisterium of the Catholic Church.

The Tale of Two Wells

Let’s envision that we live in a small village with two wells about a mile apart. One well is known to be very pure. There are no cow pastures around to pollute it, the water is very cool and crystal clear, and tastes as perfect and satisfying as water can be. About a mile away, and a mile closer to your home, there is another well. The water is also clear, but sometimes people get an upset stomach when they drink it, so most don’t. Rumor has it that some, in distant times when it was used regularly for drinking, became very sick from this well. Many people now use it for animals but for people it seems to cause unpredictable problems. Which well would you chose to use for your drinking water? Would you regularly walk the extra mile to a source that you know has been in use and tested for thousands of years and that is even officially recognized as the most pure water in the region? Would you take a chance on impure water when you had the best and most pure water available to you?

As a former well-studied protestant, I can tell you that 100% of the mountain of protestant material I consumed has what we will call assumptions built into it. In the vast majority of the material, these assumptions range from specifically anti-Catholic to other basic assumptions (e.g. sola scriptura etc.) that are simply antithetical to Catholic teaching without any specific animus towards Catholic beliefs. The latter are often hard to detect but in essence serve to chip away at the pure Gospel truth that Christ has provided to us. In all cases, from the standpoint of pure Catholic teaching, the well is tainted. The well is not pure and thus the spiritual and practical results of consumption are unpredictable. The difficult part is that to the untrained eye or the unseasoned traveler, the protestant well might look just fine and the negative effects might not be immediate or obvious. The water looks clear and tastes good. However, if you have a well you know is perfectly pure why take the risk?

Is Good Catholic Material Really That Hard to Find?

This is the really the most baffling part. In the analogy, I have placed the pure well farther from your home and thus more difficult to access. I guess this might be apt for folks living in the Bible belt or those who live in places where good Catholic material is hard to find. However, with the internet, and online stores, EWTN on Television and Radio, the best of the best and most pure water is available to most people most of the time.

Why Go Anywhere Else?

The Lord established a Church. He guaranteed, by his Holy Spirit, that all the firepower of hell itself could not withstand or in any way subvert the heart and truth of his Church. Now, we all know that with human beings, imperfection reigns. However, with very rare exception, the teachings of the Church do not depend on any one individual. In an ultimate sense, they never depend on any individual but upon God Himself. Regardless, the Church provides a well of spiritual resources that is so deep and so pure that no individual, even if given a lifetime purely devoted to study, could every fully consume.

Where to Start?

Well, regarding study of the spiritual life we have provided a solid list of recommended materials. Beyond this list, you can look to the Catechism of the Catholic Church, and then the writings of the thirty three doctors of the Church (which have been thoroughly vetted by hundreds of years of study and evaluation by the Church). If you want to know where to buy Catholic materials without worrying about their fidelity to Christ’s teachings, EWTN’s Religious Catalogue is a great place to start.

May you seek and find the pure, perfect, and life-giving water that only Christ and His Church can provide.

Subscribe To Site:


  • Yule

    wow… I stop drinking the well with many impurities… 
    good analogy. as the impure well is nearer and easily accessible… they are offering free leaflets, materials, door to door delivery…. Glad I found that the Catholic church provides materials which are very excellent, well written and truly guided by the Holy Spirit.

  • Abba’s Daughter+

    Catholic TV is also very good. You can also get a lot of good Catholic information on face-book. In the search bar you can put in Catholic Church, Blessed Mother, History of the Catholic Church, and find all kinds of things about our Catholic Faith. Father Barron has a Page on  and he is also on Catholic TV, he is excellent. I also go to utube and google Catholic topic and watch videos that defend our faith.

  • JUDY KALLMEYER

    There are so many avenues for good Catholic reading. The Leaflet Missal Company has a web site and you can get a catalogue from them via the internet. They have many wonderful Catholic books and videos. Paulist Press is another good source and Ave Maria Press is another. Just enter the names in your browser and the sites should pop up. Good luck!

  • Barbaraksanders

    I am a Catholic convert.  It took me 10 yrs. after my conversion to
    find the well you are talking about.  It happened through a direct
    intervention of the Holy Spirit.
    There is very little “spiritual” teaching in my parish and many others.
    Cannot understand why the parishes don’t do more in this
    arena??  barbara

  • Cecemars1

    I have found that  a Catholic radio station is very good too, especially when you are traveling in your car and can’t read. God bless you all and may you find the pure water to drink from. This is a great story to remember.. Thank you so much.

  • Salter

    There were a couple of ladies in my catholic bible study group that was always recommending non-catholic material.  I finally just said that I wasn’t interested in spending time on non-catholic books.  We have the fullness of the truth.  Why study half-truths?  And anything protestant is going to be anti-catholic at it’s core.  If it wasn’t it would be catholic!!  Spend $40 and get the Manificat.  It has a wealth of information as well as scripture lessons for every day.  It’s all I have time for an it’s very well organized.  If I get through that everyday I fell pretty good about myself.

    • Thomazap

      Great piece of advice!
      My faith and love for Christ and his Church has grown due to Magnificat! Christ is King!

  • Elaine A. Thomas

    I too am a convert of sort, as I was baptized Catholic but raised by a devout Evangelical Father who was Pentecostal.  We read the King James Bible and I keep my King James Bible next to my Douay-Rheims and love them both.  As one nun who was my college literature ptrofessor put it–the King James Bible is beautifully written.  I avail myself of some Protestant TV–the old Billy Graham and the Gaithers have really been a blessing to me however many Catholic programming on EWTN is wonderful.

  • Iowafarmwife

    I do generally agree with your article, but I have to say that I have never found anything written by C.S. Lewis to be troublesome to me as a Catholic.

    • danburke

      Ah yes – very good point. In fact, C.S. Lewis is really the top of the mountain as far as protestant writers/think that he is always worth reading and studying. Many of his ideas and perspectives are very Catholic.

    • Vince C

      I was was asked by a Protestant if I ever read any non-Catholic writers. When I told him I read a lot of Lewis, he practically sniffed and turned up his nose and replied, “Well- he’s just barely Protestant…”

  • danburke

    Well said. The Catholic Christian East has many deep and pure wells. Still, I would stick to those who pre-date the schism and with those that are in full communion with Rome. We have actually had a Maronite Bishop write for this blog last year. Here’s the link: http://rcspiritualdirection.com/blog/tags/maronite

  • JoFlemings

    I could preach for an hour about this topic.  I will try to restrain myself here. First of all I whole heartedly agree with Dan’s opinion here. The analogy I like to use is one of a buffet. As Catholics we have the whole buffet available to us of truth in our teaching, and we progress through the meal process with order and decorum according to our Catholic family culture- we eat what is healthy and mainstay first in an orderly fashion in proper measure for appropriate nutrition, and then we enjoy dessert apertifs etc. Ok, all of this is at the heart of being authentically devotedly Catholic. Protestants are of course picking and choosing between what appeals most to them on a spectrum of ideas- for a host of reasons, some of which are really flaky- the flakier bunch only choose very limited items from the table because their definitions of nutrition are well, skewed. Now the really off sects, well, they are skipping the food and just eating the napkins or talking about how they silverware is eventually going to be the reason for living- etc. You can go miles with this analogy, but maybe right off track.   Any way- the real point I want to make is that while we have the whole buffet table here, we need to become ALOT more familiar with the WORD OF GOD, the Bible. Our people do not understand the heart and mind of God in this culture because they do not know His word and they do not listen to His Church- it is two sides of the same coin and we need both intensely to survive. 

    • danburke

      Brilliant as usual Jo. I am going to steal your “eating the napkins” analogy!

  • Surefootmf

    EWTN is an excellent Catholic cable tv network .
    I live in the New York City area and I also
    receive the Catholic cable tv network called ” Telecare”.
    Telecare does have a website. 
    For spiritual reading I recommend “The Imitation of Christ”,
    this book is :second” to the Catholic bible , plus a Catholic priest also recommended the book.  I am also going to read
    The Way of Perfection by St. Teresa of Avila , which was also recommended  by a Catholic priest .  God Bless you.

  • Alex Campbell Phd

    I agree with Dan too and anilwang somewhat. I have read Catholic works extensively since coming over from Protestantism in 2006. However, I did recently participate in a protestant divorce support group and am currently in a non-denominational post-abortion support group. I have found more fellowship in these settings and genuine assistance to heal things in my past. Of course I frequent the sacraments and am about to begin spiritual direction with a Catholic director. My parish offers no divorce support group and I have already participated in Project Rachel, which was wonderful.

    In my groups I do not hide the fact that I am Catholic and I feel strong enough in my faith that I could defend true Catholic doctrine. Most of the participants seem surprised to see a Catholic there but when we pray there is a genuine love for Christ     the protestants in my groups have basically the same views as the church on the indissolubility of marriage and the sanctity of life. Who knows, hopefully by my being in the groups someone might be curious about the faith and ask me! I have helped a few lapsed Catholics to come back to the faith and I want God to use me as much as possible. So, I guess I am trying to be salt and light wherever I go….

  • Howard Richards

    I would say that it depends on what you mean by Bible study materials.  Atlases, archaeology, etc. are (or should be) non-doctrinal areas of interest.  Let’s not commit the genetic fallacy.

    At the same time, there are MANY Catholic aids that are abominable.  I’m thinking of the NAB Study Bible, for example, both for its bad translation (“and the earth was without form or shape, with darkness over the abyss and a mighty wind sweeping over the waters”) and for the way it assumes that whenever any difficulty is presented, the historicity of Scripture is to be discarded.

  • http://www.bedlamorparnassus.blogspot.com/ Magister Christianus

    From this same line of reasoning should give us a certain perspective on educating our children in public schools.  Admittedly, some families do not have a “pure well” close by and are, for a variety of reasons, unable to homeschool.  That said, if the “pure well” of a Christian education is available, even through sacrifice, would it not be incumbent upon us who are parents to see that our children drink the clear water of truth rather than the brackish sewage offered by an educational system that, in its very design, denies God?

    • danburke

      Same problem but on the other side of John’s comments. My argument is limited to answering the question, “What should most Catholics consume most of the time?” Some are called to consume much more broadly, but not many. Some are called to have their kids home-schooled or in Catholic schools, but not all and not all the time.

  • Plass_frank

    sounds anti protestant to me.  diversity lets us really learn.  try it.  some catholic wells are polluted, i can tell you that.

    • danburke

      There are no magisterium faithful wells that are polluted. There are wells that have a “Catholic” sign on them…

    • danburke

      Anti-protestant would include ad hominem attacks, unfair characterizations etc. I never do that on purpose. It is not anti-protestant to disagree with charity.

    • Vince C

      It is not anti-Protestant at all. The writer is simply making the common-sense observation that Catholics are better served by reading primarily Catholic material, especially if they are not particularly practiced at spotting Protestant ideas that are contrary to Catholic teaching.

       I once discussed this very issue with a Baptist who had this very same objection. I asked her if she would give Catholic Bible material to a new Baptist or refer her to a Catholic Bible study. She very quickly said, “No!”

  • Marcy K.

    When I was coming back to the Church 16 years ago I really faced this question.  My cousin, the one who gave me a bible that started my conversion of heart, is also strongly anti-Catholic.  Her husband is an ex-Catholic and they think they know all of what the Catholic Church teaches.  They are also missionaries in Romania “planting churches.”  They would mail me tons of books to aid in my coming to Jesus and wanted to know the exact date & time I gave my life to Christ.  I read some of the books, but I knew instinctively that if I was going to be Catholic I had to only read Catholic stuff – and only good faithful Catholic stuff.  I  had found so many Catholic books that were vague, junk and even taught against the Church.  I had even unknowingly bought a Catholic study bible (with imprimitur) that had comments that made the Eucharist seem like only a symbol!

    While I have a few protestant books/reference materials (A Case for Christ, A Dictionary of Early Christian Beliefs, etc.)  I definitely stay away from protestant books and studies.  You will never get the correct teaching on the Eucharist, or an indepth honest look at Mary, etc.  If you are just learning about the Church teachings and how to be a Catholic you just can’t separate what is good from bad, and even with some Catholic books you have to figure out some nuances that may be confusing.  I started my blog http://www.LiveCatholic.net to recommend good Catholic resources and help people know where to go.  All the ones people mentioned here are good.  Catholic Answers is great, iPadre podcasts are fantastic.  There really is no excuse now not to have good resources.  There are TONS of excellent bible studies for Catholics like Catholic Scripture Study Intl. http://www.cssprogram.net/ or the Great Adventure Series http://biblestudyforcatholics.com/, and beginner studies like the ones at Emmaus Road http://www.emmausroad.org/Bible-Studies-C489.aspx,  There is just unlimited material online, you just need to start with the good faithful places and in time you will figure out the wheat from the chaff.  Thanks for this post, it is an important topic.

    • danburke

      Another very reliable place to check on resources is via Catholic Culture. They have the best web site reviews bar none. Here’s the address: http://www.catholicculture.org/culture/reviews/

  • John Woolley

    How about Cardinal Newman’s “Parochial and Plain Sermons”, written while he was an Anglican?  What about Chesterton’s “Orthodoxy” (and a whole lot of other books), also Anglican?

    • danburke

      Ah yes – my inductive thinking friends abound… The principle is not nullified by the exception. Post Conversion Newman is better than pre – all is very enlightening – but some is confusing because of his own struggles (tracts on 39 articles etc). Same with Chesterton… My point stands – most Catholics should stick with specifically magisterium faithful materials most of the time.

  • Adam Rasmussen

    Saying that the spiritual interpretation of Gen 1:2 is based on “2000 years of Christian understanding” is not quite accurate. See what St. Basil the Great says about it in his homilies on the hexaemeron. He accepts both interpretations, clearing implying that in his day (4th century) some people took it one way and others the other way. It’s a legitimate question to be debated within Catholicism, like virtually all questions about Bible translation.

    • Howard Richards

      I wasn’t aware of the quote by St. Basil, but I had noticed myself the parallel between Genesis 1:2 and Genesis 8:1, so I have no objection to noting in a footnote that “Spirit of God” could be read “mighty wind”.  I do, however, maintain that the vast preponderance of Christian writing on this verse has understood it to refer to the Holy Spirit.  In St. Augustine’s books on Genesis, for example, I don’t recall him ever making use of the “wind” reading.

      As it concerns the NAB, this is just a convenient example of a more worrisome trend — a desire to be as contrary as they can get away with to traditional Catholic understanding.  The translators went a little too far with the Psalms, so they had to be re-translated, but the rest of it is still a sub-par translation.

      My overall point, though, is that one has to be careful even of apparently good Catholic sources.  As another example, I had a very hard night when I read in “50 Questions on the Natural Law” by Charles Rice that the Church now teaches that the state MAY NOT execute someone because that person deserves in justice to be executed, but MAY execute that person because it is “necessary for the public good”.  Goodbye justice, hello utilitarianism?  The next morning I looked up the actual passages in the Catechism, Evangelium Vitae, etc., and discovered that this was utterly false. At that point I was very angry with Rice for having written such foolishness, and I would not recommend the book to anyone.

    • JoFlemings

      You know the concept of ‘mighty wind’ and ‘breath of God’ as the Holy Spirit could have been the same in the context of knowing what you are hearing/reading in the tradition through which Genesis was being transmitted for so MANY years- so in translations we have to take more into account maybe than just the words themselves. I do agree with the contention here that taking Sacred Scripture and parsing it out as poetry and myth mixed with objective related account according to the western concept of journalistic history writing- is a source of conflict for Catholics about the Bible. This is why so many Catholics are afraid of the Bible. And to our collective detriment. What people need to do is really read it and get to know it and pray as they do so, then take the issues that they do not understand and see reliable Catholic scholarly and prayerful sources to put together for themselves what the Lord is trying to tell them. 

  • danburke

    Dear Friend – with all the charity I can muster I can’t agree. I am very familiar with Piper and have read the book you mention. It is solidly protestant and Piper’s theology is antithetical to ours. In fact, I believe he presents an impoverished view of this and many other topics. There are many sources that are far better in the Church. I don’t think that I would be quick to pin this book selection on the Holy Spirit. All that said, I am glad it was helpful. The next book on fasting should come from a better well.

  • danburke

    Unitatis Redintegratio certainly calls us to unity but not an equal unity but a unity that mitigates “deficiencies” and brings all to the fullness of faith in the Catholic Church. With respect to protestant scholarship – you are correct to assert that a good protestant mind can assess an archeological site just as well as a good Catholic mind. I agree. However, when we begin to frame salvation history and interpret its meaning for our lives, protestant presuppositions hinder their ability to such an extent that what appears to be a matter of historic fact is in fact, a distortion of greater or lesser proportion. Protestant scholarship has yielded pillars of salt like Graf Wellhausen’s Documentary Hypothesis, and other “Higher” criticism which has poisoned the well of interpretation for years and which Pope Benedict dissected handily in his introduction to Jesus of Nazareth. Unless you are a professor of history, theology, or philosophy, these tools are a waste of energy and will lead down a path of secular thinking and deconstruction of a scholarship of faith.

    • danburke

      I will grant an exception. I recently gifted my Kittel’s (of which I suspect you might be familiar) to Fr. Mitch Pacwa. Fr. Mitch is more than capable of using this protestant material effectively. However, he is one in a million. He, and a few other gifted scholars have very sophisticated and effective filters. When they draw water from “deficient” wells, they filter out the impurities and use it for the good. I know many world class scholars – they are very few who can do this effectively.

  • JoFlemings

    I want to address this too- my husband was a student at Denver Seminary (a mainline Evangelical seminary) for a number of years (3) in our faith journey as we slowly worked our way by hook and crook home to Rome. Protestants believe along a spectrum of ideas because their theology is centered in their Bible alone (which is actually not the same as ours- their Bible does not include the Deuterocanonical books). So they are trying to create absolutes from an incomplete source divorced from its origin. The way they do that is by using the scientific method for analyzing scripture. By that, I mean they take as much empirical evidence as available about what a word or phrase might mean and then decide on its meaning or interpret it based on how much evidence they can find that might support their decision. Often the initial premise about what the Bible says is  not based in ‘what was believed by all men in all places in all times’ a maxim from antiquity about Divine tradition- but rather, what has been assumed by Protestants since the various schisms and reformations. Jesus teaching in John 6 about the Eucharist is a prime example. Protestants believe Jesus to be speaking figuratively about His Body and Blood- they do not recognize the writings of Justin Martyr that clearly explain otherwise- nor do they acknowledge that the understanding we hold to as Catholics was the accepted understanding for the first 1500 years of Christian history. The truth about the Eucharist is a game changer and a dogmatic lynchpin. In most cases they refuse to see it. This is because their theology is also broadly dualistic- or sort of unintentionally gnostic at its root. For them grace comes by ‘acknowledging and receiving Jesus’,  this is largely a mental, or psycho-emotional exercise, with a wide variety of definitions. There are HUGE gaps and inconsistencies in their theology, and moral theology especially is a free for all. How to live a holy life is a really hard to pin down sticky wicket as a Protestant. If you don’t really know this it is easy to trip lightly along according to a comfortable path ignoring major issues- until they overwhelm the soul. It’s like having only one half of the treasure map- and wandering along the paths on that half only.

    • danburke

      Perfect example.

  • Mobrien7

    Hello,

    Thank you for sharing this example.  My wife was Protestant and has recently converted to the Church.  We have conversations about this topic.

    Mike

  • Kmsbean

    Not to attack the Roman Church, but if you think that is the well that has never been polluted you missed a couple lessons in Church history.  While is will acknowledge there are errors in Protestantism (vastly more in some denominations), the Catholic church has also erred and contradicted itself.  Both sides need to read more of the other’s writings, so we can better see Truth from other perspectives.  Yes, there will be issues we disagree on, but I think you will see far more that we agree on, and much more value that was not even thought of.  For example, I was greatly blessed and inspired to read the works of St. Augustine, perhaps you Catholics should read more Luther?  Compare Tertullian’s De Baptismo and Menno Simmons’ On Baptism.  Sometimes you may find a difficult question that challenges your belief, but that is not a bad thing, for it forces you to really think and consider what you truly believe.  I’m sure if there is an issue where Christians have disagreed there is always plenty of resources to consider each side, including the Catholic teachinig.

    • danburke

      You are highlighting a perfect example of a serious misreading or failure to engage what I wrote in the post (I will make a charitable assumption that you missed it in the post and in all of my comments). I have clearly pointed people to magisterium faithful material. This is a qualification that is unambiguously not tainted with error.

    • http://rcspiritualdirection.com/blog Mary@42

      As Dan points out, 
      Kmsbean, the Catholic Church Magisterium Materials have remained unchanged. May I refer you to a wonderful Website which deals with the errors Protestants and non-Catholics continue to throw at our Church.  It is Shameless Poppery.  There you will find authentic responses to the erroneous Doctrines other Faiths make about the Catholic Faith. Be blessed

  • http://rcspiritualdirection.com/blog Mary@42

    Now, Dan, what can this old Cradle Catholic say about this Post?  What would an authentic Catholic be looking for in Protestant literature.  Your response says it all. I am aware we Catholics are accused of being ignorant or ill-read about the Bible. Time and time again, I am called upon to reiterate that in our times – the 40′s all the way to 60′s, and even the 70′s in my part of the world, Catholic upbringing by devout Catholic parents, schooling in Catholic Schools and Convents, ensured by the time one left High School, one was well grounded in the Catholic Faith and knew the Scriptures and the Magisterium Teachings of our Church pretty well. Those who proceeded to College, came out well informed about the History of our Mother Church.   

    So, what is my point?  Anyone who is genuinely serious about remaining a committed and faithful Catholic, would be well advised to begin to learn – and strive to faithfully live –  the richness and the fullness of their Faith and the Salvation Mystery through the Teachings of Jesus which subsists in totality in the Catholic Church which He Himself founded.

  • David Paggi, Charleston SC

    There is such an enormous quantity of excellent Catholic content, by which I mean orthodox material presented with passion & clarity by trustworthy authors, there is little reason to venture into uncharted protestant waters. Bank tellers can instantly recognize counterfeit precisely because they deal only in authentic currency.

    So how to know who is trustworthy? Simple – watch or listen to EWTN. In particular, I would suggest “The Journey Home” hosted by Marcus Grodi, which showcases the striking paths trod by converts or reverts to the faith. Dan has appeared before, which is why I followed this post, which I found linked on NewAdvent.com ( a truly remarkable resource). Besides learning from the guests’ experiences wrestling with doctrinal or more prosaic conflicts, notice the price paid by these folks. We truly have the “pearl of great price”, so be warned: for this faith to have any value, it must inevitably cost something.

    For more intensive study, peruse the audio & document libraries. And don’t be intimidated by papal documents; they are a real treasure. You can get commentary by downloading audio of “Theshhold of Hope” by Fr. Mitch Pacwa, S. J. Also get his Bible studies & homilies.

    There is much, much more – but between Dan’s list & the above, you have a few years’ worth of study. Bon appetit!

  • UnitLeader

    While I agree with what you say, and while I read mainly Catholic material, I also read other works as well.  As a career military man I have read Sun Tzu’s Art of War and Von Clausewitz’s On War and their main point is “Know your enemy”.  And while other works are not the enemy per se; the idea of knowing the other points of view fall within this statement.  And, as for myself, I find that my Catholic beliefs are even stronger after I read some of these other views. The more I read other works; the more I understand my own.

  • David Paggi, Charleston SC

    UnitLeader:
    I agree with you; however, I was responding to the initial query. I believe that one who asks the question if Protestant material is OK is likely to not yet be sufficiently grounded in Catholic apologetics to recognize all of the disparities to be encountered. Put another way, I have to be sufficiently familiar with a piece of music before I can hear when a particular rendition strays from the composer’s score.

    • danburke

      Makes sense

  • danburke

    Judgement call. They are closer to us, orders are valid, sacraments are valid. I spend a good deal of time in Orthodox writings. The challenge is with the primacy of Peter…

  • Zimmy101b

    I realize your belief in the truths of the Catholic faith, and your perspective, but if I read a highly recommended Christian book I don’t pay attention to ideas that are not Catholic. They are such broad concepts that they are easy to spot. Some of these books are life-changing (depending on the person). One book that changed my life
    is “Absolute Surrender” by Andrew Murray. It was the right book at the right time. I believe the Holy Spirit led me to it.